International Psoriasis Council

Advancing Knowledge. Enhancing Care.

Advancing Knowledge. Enhancing Care.

Commentary: Drug Survival Associated with Effectiveness and Safety of Treatment with Guselkumab, Ixekizumab, Secukinumab, Ustekinumab, and Adalimumab in Patients with Psoriasis

Blog - Commentary - Alexander Egeberg - graphic

Alexander Egeberg, MD, PhD, DMSc
Bispebjerg Hospital
Copenhagen, Denmark


Drug Survival Associated with Effectiveness and Safety of Treatment with Guselkumab, Ixekizumab, Secukinumab, Ustekinumab, and Adalimumab in Patients with Psoriasis. Yiu ZZN, Becher G, Kirby B, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Jul 6:e222909. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.2909. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35791876; PMCID: PMC9260644.

Why this article was chosen

Real-world evidence studies become crucial to achieving the evidence needed in clinical practice. But how are data evaluated in the complexity of the real world?


In recent years, clinical trials of drugs, such as interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors, have shown remarkable levels of sustained long-term clearance of psoriasis. However, a fundamental limitation of clinical trials is that the patients included in such trials are not always representative of patients seen in daily clinical practice. Only about one-third of “real-life” patients are eligible for inclusion in a clinical trial. Moreover, comorbid diseases, physician behaviors, dose modifications, regional guidelines, payer policies, and prescribed co-medication may all influence the effectiveness and safety of biologics in daily clinical practice.

In daily practice, loss of response over time is often observed. Although the reasons are still not fully understood, this degree of “biologic fatigue” appears to differ between the different biologics. The term “drug survival” refers to the probability that a patient will remain on treatment and is a critical proxy measure of effectiveness in real-life settings.

The present study examined drug survival among 16,122 treatment courses of biologic therapy with either guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, or adalimumab, using United Kingdom registry data. The authors found that guselkumab had the highest drug survival concerning effectiveness and safety. Notably, the authors also found that the effect of biologic therapy was modified by factors such as the presence of psoriatic arthritis, prior exposure to biologic therapy, current nail psoriasis, and ethnicity, thus highlighting that “one size does not fit all” when it comes to treating psoriasis.

Significantly, however, treatment patterns may change over time, and a patient is more likely to, e.g., discontinue adalimumab in the present day compared with twenty years ago, when alternatives were much more limited. The study adds to the growing list of real-world studies suggesting that novel biologics, such as the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab, have a higher drug survival in psoriasis. Still, there remains an essential need for “personalized evidence,” i.e., predictors showing which patient profiles will benefit the most from a specific biologic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Recent Posts

Psoriasis and the Pandemic: Lessons Learned from PsoProtect

Boehringer Ingelheim’s SPEVIGO® Receives Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Shining a Spotlight on our 2022 Fellows: Get to Know the Future Leaders in Psoriasis – Juul van den Reek, MD, PhD

Also Read


Commentary: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence for Suppression of Alcohol Intake by Apremilast

A host of factors is important to consider in the personalized treatment of psoriasis. It is advantageous if a treatment is effective in psoriasis and has beneficial effects on associated conditions. This recent literature publication has highlighted that apremilast, beyond its anti-psoriatic properties, positively impacts excessive alcohol consumption. Read the expert opinion of IPC Board Member Johann Gudjonsson, MD, PhD.

Read More
Commentary -Tiago Torres
Tiago Torres

Commentary: Trajectories and Prognosis after Discontinuation of Biologics due to Remission in Psoriasis – A Nationwide Cohort Study

The prognosis and maintenance of response after treatment discontinuation following remission lack proper characterization. Real-world data obtained from national registries may provide valuable insights into this clinical issue. Tiago Torres, MD, PhD, provides his expert opinion on a recent study that investigated epidemiological characteristics and disease markers during the first two years following cessation of biologic therapy due to remission in adult patients.

Read More
Commentary -Peter van de Kerkhof headshot
Peter van de Kerkhof

Commentary: Association of Apremilast with Vascular Inflammation and Cardiometabolic Function in Patients with Psoriasis: The VIP-A Phase 4, Open-label, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Recently, a study was conducted on the effect of apremilast on vascular inflammation and cardiometabolic functions with an impressively comprehensive set of markers for vascular inflammation and cardiometabolic disease. Peter van de Kerkhof, MD, PhD, provides his expert opinion on the overall conclusion and the implications of this study are discussed.

Read More

Subscribe to the IPC Newsletter

Stay up-to-date on the latest research, news, and upcoming events right in your inbox.