International Psoriasis Council

Advancing Knowledge. Improving Care.

IPC Disease Severity Reclassification Tables

TRACKING REAL-WORLD APPLICATION OF IPC’S NEW DISEASE SEVERITY CRITERIA

IPC’s Disease Severity Working Group has refined the criteria for psoriasis disease severity based on the latest clinical trials and observational data. These tables demonstrate where and how our new classification is already being applied, helping to build momentum for broader adoption: 

  • Table 1: Studies Applying IPC’s Criteria 
    A list of peer-reviewed clinical trials and cohort studies that have implemented our consensus definitions. 
  • Table 2: Guidelines Which Reflect IPC’s Reclassification 
    National and regional dermatology organizations whose psoriasis guidelines incorporate elements of the IPC reclassification, with the year each update was integrated. 

Additional tables identify published treatment targets to assist clinicians in identifying transition points from topical to systemic therapy. 

Designed as a transparent, citable resource, these tables showcase real-world implementation of IPC’s new severity criteria, both in peer-reviewed studies worldwide and within official practice guidelines, to provide compelling evidence that encourages others to follow suit. Use the quick links below to jump directly to each table, or scroll for the full dataset. 

IPC Disease Severity Reclassification: Implementation

National Guidelines Treatment Targets and Treatment Transition

Table 1: Clinical Trials on Small Molecules and Biologics for Patients with Psoriasis on High Impact Sites

StudyDrug and Study PopulationResultsReference
IXORA-QIxekizumab in patients with moderate to severe genital psoriasis73% of patients on ixekizumab reached SPGA 0 or 1 vs 8% of patients on placebo at week 16Ryan C, Menter A, Guenter , et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase IIIb study of patients with moderate-to-severe genital psoriasis Br J Dermatol. 2018;179:844-852. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16736.
DISCREET Apremilast in patients with moderate to severe genital psoriasis39.6% of patients on apremilast reached a Modified sPGA-G 0 or 1 and a reduction ≥2 points of Modified sPGA-G vs 19.5% of patients on placebo at week 16Merola JF, ParishLC, Guenter L, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate-to-severe genital psoriasis: Results from DISCREET, a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90:485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.10.020
G-PLUSGuselkumab in nonpustular palmolantar psoriasis35.9% of patients on guselkumab reached ppPASI75 vs 28.2% of patients on placebo at week 16Passeron T, Carrascosa JM, Warren RB, et al. A Phase IIIb, Multicentre, Interventional, Randomised Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab for the Treatment of Nonpustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis (G-PLUS). Dermatologic Therapy Volume 2023, Article ID 9967747
REACHAdalimumab in patients with moderate to chronic plaque psoriasis of hands and feet31% of patients on adalimumab reached hfPGA75 vs 4% of patients on placebo at week 16Leonardo C, Langley RG, Papp K, et al Adalimumab for treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis of the hands and feet: efficacy and safety results from REACH, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147:429-36
GESTURESecukinumab in palmoplantar psoriasis33.3% of patients on secukinumab 300mg reached ppIGA 0/1 and a reduction of ≥2 points in ppIGA vs 22.1% of patients on secukinumab 150mg vs 1.5% of patients on placebo at week 16Gottlieb A, Sullivan J, van Doorn M, et al. Secukinumab shows significant efficacy in palmoplantar psoriasis: Results from GESTURE, a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017 ;76:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.058
IMMprint Risankizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with non-pustular palmoplantar involvement33.3% of patients on Risankizumab 150 mg reached ppIGA 0/1 and a reduction of ≥2 points in ppIGA vs 16.1% of patients on placebo at week 16Lebwohl M, Bukhalo M, Stein Gold L, et al. randomized phase 3b study evaluating the safety and efficacy of risankizumab in adult patients with moderate-to- severe plaque psoriasis with non- pustular palmoplantar involvement J Am Acad Dermatol 2024;91:1150-7
STYLEApremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp43% of patients on apremilast reached ScPGA score 0 or 1 with ≥2-point reduction from baseline vs 13,7% of patients on placebo at week 16Van Voorhees AS, SteinGold L, Lebwohl M, et al. Efficacy and safety of apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: Results of a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 ;83:96-103.
Secukinumab in patients with scalp psoriasisSecukinumab in patients with moderate to severe scalp psoriasis 57% of patients on secukinumab reached IGA-scalp score of 0 or 1 vs 6% of patients on placebo on placebo at Week 12 Bagel J, Calis Duffin K, Moore A, et al. The effect of secukinumab on moderate-to-severe scalp psoriasis: Results of a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3b study. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017;77:667-74.
PSORIATYK SCALP Deucravacitinib in patients with scalp psoriasis 57.6% of patients reached sPGA 0 or 1 in vs 57,6% vs 5,3% on placebo at week 24.Lebwohl M, et al. EADV 2024, FC04.07
SPECTREMGuselkumab in patients with low BSA and involvement of high impact sites74% of patients on Guselkumab reached IGA score of 0 or 1 vs 12% in the placebo group at week16

Site-specific IGA/PGA 0/1 response rates for guselkumab versus placebo were: scalp, 75.0% (114/152) versus 14.5% (11/76); face, 87.8% (79/90) versus 28.6% (12/42); genital, 78.0% (64/82) versus 37.5% (15/40); and intertriginous, 86.5% (96/111) versus 28.8% (15/52).
Presented by L Stein Gold at Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 24-27, 2024; Wynn Las Vegas, NV, USA


Presented at the 2025 Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 23-26, 2025; Las Vegas, NV, USA.
GULLIVERGuselkumab in patients with facial (FP) and genital psoriasis (GP).3% of FP patients achieving a facial sPGA score of 0 or 1 at Week 12; 76.5% of GP patients achieving a facial sPGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) at Week 12Bonifati C, Lembo S, Richetta AG, et al. Effectiveness of guselkumab in patients with facial and/or genital psoriasis: Interim analysis results at Week 12 from the GULLIVER study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025;39(Suppl 1):7-14.
ICONIC-TOTAL Icotrokinra  in psoriasis on high-impact sites (scalp, genitals, hands, and feet)The proportions of icotrokinra-treated and placebo-treated participants achieving absence/clear or minimal/almost clear high-impact site psoriasis were : scalp 65.9% vs10.6%); genitalia 76.5% vs  21.4%; and hand and foot 41.7% vs 26.1%.Gooderham M, Lain E, Bissonnette R, Huang YH, Lynde CW, Hoffmann M, Song EJ, Weirich O, Ceitlin RHG, Rubens JH, DeLozier AM, Ota T, Hsu MC, Li S, DeKlotz CMC, Nunes F, Warren RB. Targeted Oral Peptide Icotrokinra for Psoriasis Involving High-Impact Sites. NEJM Evid. 2025 Nov 5:EVIDoa2500155. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2500155. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 41191932.

 

Table last updated November 14, 2025

hfPGA: Global Assessment of Hands and/or Feet; ppPASI: Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and sSeverity Index; ppIGA: Palmoplantar Investigator’s Global Assessment; sPGA: Static Physician Global Assessment; IGA: Investigator Global Assessment; ScPGA: Scalp Physician Global Assessment; ppIGA: Palmoplantar Investigator’s Global Assessment; ppPASI: Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; Modified sPGA-G: Modified Static Physician Global Assessment of Genitalia

Table 2: National & Regional Guidelines Reflecting Components of the IPC Definition

Guideline yearGuideline countryReference
2011 (Updated 2024)Germanyhttps://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/013-001
2012 (Updated 2017)Europe (NICE)https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg153/chapter/Recommendations#systemic-therapy
2016Spainhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.13542
2017Italyhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28244153/
2018 (Updated 2022)Colombia https://revista.asocolderma.org.co/index.php/asocolderma/article/view/1719/1429
2019Francehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.15340
2019United Stateshttps://www.jaad.org/article/S0190-9622(18)33001-9/fulltext
2020Brazilhttps://psoriasiscouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/brazil_2020_treatment_guidelines.pdf
2020Chilehttps://psoriasiscouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/chile_treatment_guidelines.pdf
2020Saudi Arabiahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09546634.2021.1950601?scroll=top&needAccess=true#abstract
2020United Kingdomhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjd.19039
2021 (Updated 2025)Europe (EDF)

https://www.guidelines.edf.one//uploads/attachments/clpb19l7t20h9dtjrscvcuem7-2-disease-severity-treatment-goals-sep-2023.pdf
2021Mexicohttps://071d2186-dd73-483c-9a76-5f7e2b5bca70.filesusr.com/ugd/f187f1_651eb668a34b494f9a4be43a8b8773cc.pdf
2022Thailandhttps://dst.or.th/Physician/Articles/1795.29.0
2023Denmarkhttps://dds.nu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Guideline-DDS-2.-generations-immunomodulatorisk-behandling-opdatering-december-2023_Final-1.pdf
2023Koreahttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10258552/#ref-list1
2023Australiahttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37501636/
2024Finlandhttps://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi50062
2024Japanhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39229687/

 

Table last updated June 27, 2025

Table 1: Treatment Targets According to National Guidelines and Expert Groups

Striving for clear skin has a major impact on improving quality of life (1, 2). 

Outcome Measure
Source
Region
Country
% PASIPASI (res) BSA (res) DLQI PGA National GuidelineExpert Group Time Frame Ref
Africa/Eastern Mediterranean
Saudi Arabia ≤90 ≤3 0/1 X17
Europe
Denmark ≤3 DDS 16
Europe ≤90≤2 ≤2 0/1 EDF 8, 25
France ≤90 ≤3 0/1 FSD 11
Germany#≤90 ≤3 ≤2 DDG 20
Italy ≤90 ≤3 X3–4 months 10
Poland ≤90 PDS14
Portugal ≤90 ≤2 SPVD12
Spain ≤90 ≤3-5 minimal 0/1 0/1 SADV13
Switzerland* ≤75 ≤5 SSDV24
United Kingdom≤2 0/1 BAD 5
Latin America/Caribbean
Argentina@ ≤90 ≤3 0/1 0/1 SAD 22
Brasil@ ≤90-100 ≤3 ≤3 0/1 0/1 SBD 21
Colombia≤90 ≤3 ACDD 23
Colombia ≤75! ≤5! ACDD 23
North America
Canada ≤3 ≤10/1 X6
Canada ≤75CDA 7
United States≤1NPF 3 months3, 4
Southeast Asia/Western Pacific
Australia ≤90 ≤3 0/1 ACD 9
China ≤90-100 0/1 SCD 19
Japan ≤90 ≤20/1 JDA 15
Malaysia ≤3 ≤5JDA 18

 

Table last updated August 14, 2025

Abbreviations: PASI: Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI res: residual PASI; BSA: Body Surface Area; BSA res: residual BSA; DLQI: Dermatology Life Quality Index; PGA: Physician’s Global Assessment; DDS  Danish Dermatological Association; EDF: European Dermatology Forum; FSD: Frech Society of Dermatology; DDG: Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft; PDS: Polish Dermatological Society; SPVD: Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; SADV: Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology; SSDV: Swiss Society of Dermatology and Venereology; BAD: British Association of Dermatologists; SAD: Sociedad Argentina de Dermatologia; SBD: Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia; ACDD: Asociación Colombiana de Dermatología y Cirugía Dermatológica; CDA: Canadian Dermatology Association; NPF: National Psoriasis Foundation; ACD: Australian College of Dermatologists; SCD: Chinese Society of Dermatology; JDA: Japanese Dermatological Association; DSM: Dermatologic Society of Malaysia 

#There is an ongoing discussion within DDG. 

*A potential future goal of reaching PASI90 within 52 weeks after starting therapy seems achievable with newer therapies. 

@PASI 75 can be accepted as minimum treatment maintenance index if patient has no negative impact in quality of life. 

!Combination required. 

  1. Strober B, Papp KA, Lebwohl M, et al. Clinical meaningfulness of complete skin clearance in psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:77-82. 
  2. Augustin M, Gottlieb AB, Lebwohl M, et al. Complete skin clearance is associated with the greatest benefits to health-related quality of life and perceived symptoms for patients with psoriasis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024;14:2841-2857. 
  3. https://www.psoriasis.org/treating-to-target/.
  4. Armstrong A, González-Cantero A, Khattri S, et al. Comparing Achievement of National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets among Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab versus Other Biologics in Clinical and Real-World Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;14(4):933-952. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01136-w. Epub 2024 Mar 23. PMID: 38521874; PMCID: PMC11052751. 
  5. Mahil SK, Wilson N, Dand N, et al. Psoriasis treat to target: defining outcomes in psoriasis using data from a real-world, population-based cohort study (the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register, BADBIR). Br J Dermatol. 2020 May;182(5):1158-1166. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18333. Epub 2019 Sep 10. PMID: 31286471; PMCID: PMC7317460. 
  6. Gladman DD, Poulin Y, Adams K, Bourcier M, et al. Treating Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: Position Paper on Applying the Treat-to-target Concept to Canadian Daily Practice. J Rheumatol. 2017 Apr;44(4):519-534. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.161473. PMID: 28604347. 
  7. Canadian Psoriasis Guidelines Addendum Committee. 2016 Addendum to the Canadian Guidelines for the Management of Plaque Psoriasis 2009. J Cutan Med Surg . 2016 Jul 15;20(5):375–431. doi: 10.1177/1203475416655705.
  8. https://www.guidelines.edf.one//uploads/attachments/cm9h6g6wp9exorwjr9msyrqbc-0-euroguiderm-pso-gl-feb-2025.pdf
  9. https://www.dermcoll.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ACD-Consensus-Adaptation-Psoriasis-May-2024.pdf
  10. Gisondi P, Talamonti M, Chiricozzi A, et al. Treat-to-Target Approach for the Management of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Consensus Recommendations. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Feb;11(1):235-252. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00475-8. Epub 2021 Jan 11. PMID: 33426634; PMCID: PMC7859133.
  11. Amatore F, Villani AP, Tauber M, Viguier M, Guillot B; Psoriasis Research Group of the French Society of Dermatology (Groupe de Recherche sur le Psoriasis de la Société Française de Dermatologie). French guidelines on the use of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Mar;33(3):464-483. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15340. Epub 2019 Feb 22. PMID: 30793796; PMCID: PMC6593704.
  12. Torres T, Tavares Bello R, et al. Portuguese recommendations for the treatment of psoriasis with biologic therapy..Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;30(6):645-654. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3945. 
  13. Puig L, Carrascosa JM, Carretero G, et al. Spanish evidence-based guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents, Part 1: On efficacy and choice of treatment. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2013;104(8):694-709. doi:10.1016/j.adengl.2013.04.013.
  14. Owczarczyk-Saczonek A, Owczarek W, Waldemar J, Placek WJ , Rudnicka L, Szepietowski J. Psoriasis: Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of the Polish Dermatological Society. Part 1. Dermatol Rev/Przegl Dermatol. 2020, 107, 92–108DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/dr.2020.95258 
  15. Saeki H, Mabuchi T, Asahina A, et al. English version of Japanese guidance for use of biologics for psoriasis (the 2022 version). J Dermatol. 2023 Feb;50(2):e41-e68. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16691. Epub 2022 Dec 29. PMID: 36582113. 
  16. https://dds.nu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Guideline-DDS-2.-generations-immunomodulatorisk-behandling-opdatering-december-2023_Final-1.pdf 
  17. Fatani MIA, Hamadah IRA, Alajlan MA, et al. Saudi consensus statement on biologic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis (2020). Journal of Dermatological Treatment. 2021; 33(4), 1916–1930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2021.1950601.
  18. Malaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), Medical Development Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia. Level 4, Management of Psoriasis (2nd ed.). Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Health Malaysia; [no date].
  19. Zhang X. Chinese Psoriasis Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (2023 edition). Chinese Medical Association Dermatology and Venereology Branch, Psoriasis Professional Committee. Chin J Dermatol. 2023 Jul: 56:673-625.  doi:10.35541/cjd.20220839.
  20. Nast A, Altenburg A, Augustin M, et al. German S3-Guideline on the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm – Part 1: Treatment goals and treatment recommendations. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Jun;19(6):934-150.DOI: 10.1111/ddg.14508
  21. Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia. Consenso Brasileiro de Psoríase 2024 – Algoritmo de Tratamento da Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia (4ª ed.). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil: Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia; 2024.
  22. Concenso National de Psoriasis. Guía de tratemento. Actualizacion 2024. Año 2, no 2. Julio 2024.
  23. Castro Ayarza JR, Franco MDF, Gonzales Ardila, Londono Garcia AM. Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la psoriasis en Colombia. Rev Asoc Colomb Dermatol. Suplemento N.1, agosto 2022. Asociación Colombiana de Dermatología y Cirugía Dermatológica – ASOCOLDERMA. ISSN 1657-0448. doi:10.29176/issn.2590843X.1719.
  24. Kolios AGA, Yawalkar N,  Anliker M,  et al. Swiss S1 Guidelines on the Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris. Dermatology. 20 September 2016; 232 (4): 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445681.
  25. Nast A, Altenburg A, Augustin M, et al. S3 Guideline for the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm – part 1: Treatment recommendations and monitoring. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2026 Jan;24(1):122-137. doi: 10.1111/ddg.16002. PMID: 41531416; PMCID: PMC12800871.

Table 2: National Guidelines and Transitioning from Topical to Systemic Treatment

All guidelines emphasize topical failure as a key indicator for systemic escalation, but exact definitions vary: 

  • None specifies a minimum duration or number of topical treatments before deeming them inadequate 
  • Terms like “inadequate control” or “failure” are interpreted in the context of extent, location, impact on quality of life, and response to previous therapies. 
Country Guidance (Year) When to Switch to Systemic Treatment  Ref.
United States AAD-NPF Guidelines (2018–2021)Systemic therapy indicated if >5–10% BSA involved or if topical treatments fail to achieve control. Also if psoriasis affects high-impact sites (hands, face, genitals, etc.) or causes significant life impact. 1
United KingdomNICE Guideline (2012, updated)If  topicals are inadequate and disease has significant impact. E.g. >10% BSA or PASI >10, or localized severe sites (nails, scalp, etc. with functional impairment), or rapid relapse after other therapy. 2,3
Canada CDA Guidelines
(2009 + 2016 addendum)
If  topical agents no longer suffice  to control disease.4
EuropeEuroGuiDerm (2025, updated) Failure of topical treatments.5
France SFD Psoriasis
Guidelines (2019)
Systemic therapy (incl. phototherapy) indicated if >10% BSA or PASI >10 or DLQI >10, or if significant physical/psychological impact, or if localized disease not controlled by topicals (e.g. severe nail, scalp, palmoplantar or genital psoriasis).6
Denmark DDS guidelines (2023)Insufficient efficacy of topical treatment in adults is defined as insufficient efficacy of daily use of a class 3-4 topical steroid or a combination of topical steroid and calcipotriol for 4 weeks, possibly extended to 8 weeks after assessment. 7
Australia ACD Guidelines (2024)Psoriasis worsens during topical treatments.8

 

Table last updated August 14, 2025

Abbreviations: AAD: American Academy of Dermatology; NICE: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; DLQI: Dermatology Quality of Life Index; SFD: Société Française de Dermatologie; CDA: Canadian Dermatological Association; DDS: Danish Dermatological Association; NPF:National Psoriasis association; ACD: Australasian College of Dermatologists 

  1. Elmets CA, Korman NJ, Prater EF, et al. Joint AAD-NPF Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with topical therapy and alternative medicine modalities for psoriasis severity measures. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Feb;84(2):432-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.087. Epub 2020 Jul 30. PMID: 327384294.  
  2. Psoriasis: assessment and management.
    Clinical guideline Published: 24 October 2012 nice.org.uknice.org.uknice.org.uknice.org.uknice.org.uk
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Psoriasis: assessment and management. NICE Clinical Guideline No. 153. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2017 Sep 1. ISBN-13: 978-1-4731-1107-3.
  4. Canadian Psoriasis Guidelines Addendum Committee. 2016 Addendum to the Canadian Guidelines for the Management of Plaque Psoriasis 2009. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016 Jul 15;20(5):375–431. doi: 10.1177/1203475416655705
  5. https://www.guidelines.edf.one//uploads/attachments/cm9h6g6wp9exorwjr9msyrqbc-0-euroguiderm-pso-gl-feb-2025.pdf
  6. Amatore F, Villani AP, Tauber M, Viguier M, Guillot B; Psoriasis Research Group of the French Society of Dermatology (Groupe de Recherche sur le Psoriasis de la Société Française de Dermatologie). French guidelines on the use of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in adults. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Mar;33(3):464-483. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15340. Epub 2019 Feb 22. PMID: 30793796; PMCID: PMC6593704. 
  7.  https://dds.nu/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Guideline-DDS-2.-generations-immunomodulatorisk-behandling-opdatering-december-2023_Final-1.pdf.
  8. https://www.dermcoll.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/ACD-Consensus-Adaptation-Psoriasis-May-2024.pdf.

What's New

First-Line Biologics in Psoriasis: Evidence from the BADBIR Cohort Study

In this IPC commentary, Matias Maskin examines evidence from the BADBIR registry demonstrating that first-line biologic therapy in moderate to severe psoriasis leads to faster skin clearance, improved quality of life, and a lower risk of comorbidities. The analysis challenges traditional step-up approaches and supports earlier, patient-centered treatment strategies.

Read More »

Recent Advances in Psoriasis: A Year in Review

In this Take Ten with IPC video, Dr. Leandro Leite discusses the most recent advances in psoriasis over the last year (March 2025 – March 2026). Topics include new guidelines, research, and recent studies.

WATCH NOW

Monday, April 6, 2026